Effectiveness of Modified Vaccinia Ankara-Bavaria Nordic Vaccination in a Population at High Risk of Mpox: A Spanish Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: With more than 7500 cases reported since April 2022, Spain has experienced the highest incidence of mpox in Europe. From 12 July onward, the modified vaccinia Ankara-Bavaria Nordic (MVA-BN) smallpox vaccine was offered as pre-exposure prophylaxis for those receiving pre-exposure prophylaxis for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-PrEP). Our aim was to assess the effectiveness of 1 dose of MVA-BN vaccine as pre-exposure prophylaxis against mpox virus (MPXV) infection in persons on HIV-PrEP. METHODS: National retrospective cohort study between 12 July and 12 December 2022. Individuals aged ≥18 years receiving HIV-PrEP as of 12 July with no previous MPXV infection or vaccination were eligible. Each day, we matched individuals receiving a first dose of vaccine and unvaccinated controls of the same age and region. We used a Kaplan-Meier estimator, calculated risk ratios (RR) and vaccine effectiveness (VE = [1 - RR]x100). RESULTS: We included 5660 matched pairs, with a median follow-up of 62 days (interquartile range, 24-97). Mpox cumulative incidence was 5.6 per 1000 (25 cases) in unvaccinated and 3.5 per 1000 (18 cases) in vaccinated. No effect was found during days 0-6 post-vaccination (VE, -38.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], -332.7 to 46.4), but VE was 65% at ≥7 days (95% CI, 22.9 to 88.0) and 79% at ≥14 days (95% CI, 33.3 to 100.0) post-vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: One dose of MVA-BN vaccine offered protection against mpox in most-at-risk population shortly after the vaccination. Further studies need to assess the VE of a second dose and the duration of protection over time.

Infection control in long term care institutions for the elderly: A reflection document on the situation in Spain

A progressively increasing percentage of the elderly live during the last years of their lives in nursing homes. Although these institutions are intended to mimic life at home as much as possible, they have characteristics that make them quite similar to a “nosocomiun”, i.e. an establishment for the treatment of the sick. The very coexistence among the elderly, the fact of sharing caregivers and the very significant exposure to third parties, together with the frequent predisposing diseases to infection in this population, make infection frequent among residents and also easily transmissible. This leads us to ask what can be done to prevent infection in this environment and more specifically what is the state of the art of the matter in a Western European nation such as ours. The Board of Trustees of the Health Sciences Foundation has asked itself a series of questions on the subject of infection prevention in Nursing Homes, the structure of procedures, the legislation available, compliance with the measures indicated, the best indicators of the processes and therefore, the need to promote in Spain a document of recommendations to avoid infections in this poplation whose morbidity and mortality need not be highlighted. To this end, a multidisciplinary group of experts in different aspects of this problem has been convened and asked the proposed questions. The questions were discussed by the group as a whole and led to a series of conclusions agreed upon by the participants. The results of the meeting are reported below (AU)

Un porcentaje progresivamente creciente de las personas mayores viven durante los últimos años de su vida en residencias de ancianos. Dichas instituciones, aunque pretenden remedar lo más posible la vida en el hogar, tienen características que las hace bastante parecidas a un nosocomio, es decir a un establecimiento destinado al tratamiento de enfermos. La propia convivencia entre los ancianos, el hecho de compartir cuidadores y la exposición muy importante a terceras personas, junto con las frecuentes enfermedades predisponentes a la infección de esta población, hacen que la infección sea frecuente entre los residentes y que además sea fácilmente transmisible. Esto nos lleva a preguntarnos qué puede hacerse para prevenir la infección en este medio y más concretamente cuál es el estado del arte de la cuestión en una nación de Europa Occidental como la nuestra. El patronato de la Fundación de Ciencias de la Salud se ha formulado una serie de preguntas sobre el tema de la prevención de la infección en las Residencias de Mayores, la estructura de la misma, la legislación vigente, el cumplimiento de las medidas indicadas, los indicadores de los procesos y por ende, la necesidad de fomentar en España un documento de recomendaciones para evitar infecciones en esta población cuya morbilidad y mortalidad no necesitan ser resaltadas. Para ello, se ha convocado a un grupo multidisciplinar de expertos en distintos aspectos de este problema a los que se les han formulado las preguntas propuestas. Las preguntas han sido discutidas por el grupo en su conjunto y han conducido a una serie de conclusiones consensuadas entre los participantes. Pasamos, a continuación a relatar los resultados de la reunión (AU)

Effectiveness of a Meningococcal Group B Vaccine (4CMenB) in Children.

BACKGROUND: In September 2015, the four-component, protein-based meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB; Bexsero) became available for private purchase in Spain. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide matched case-control study to assess the effectiveness of 4CMenB in preventing invasive meningococcal disease in children. The study included all laboratory-confirmed cases of invasive meningococcal disease in children younger than 60 months of age between October 5, 2015, and October 6, 2019, in Spain. Each case patient was matched with four controls according to date of birth and province. 4CMenB vaccination status of the case patients and controls was compared with the use of multivariate conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: We compared 306 case patients (243 [79.4%] with serogroup B disease) with 1224 controls. A total of 35 case patients (11.4%) and 298 controls (24.3%) had received at least one dose of 4CMenB. The effectiveness of complete vaccination with 4CMenB (defined as receipt of at least 2 doses, administered in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations) was 76% (95% confidence interval [CI], 57 to 87) against invasive meningococcal disease caused by any serogroup, and partial vaccination was 54% (95% CI, 18 to 74) effective. Complete vaccination resulted in an effectiveness of 71% (95% CI, 45 to 85) against meningococcal serogroup B disease. Vaccine effectiveness with at least one dose of 4CMenB was 64% (95% CI, 41 to 78) against serogroup B disease and 82% (95% CI, 21 to 96) against non-serogroup B disease. With the use of the genetic Meningococcal Antigen Typing System, serogroup B strains that were expected to be covered by 4CMenB were detected in 44 case patients, none of whom had been vaccinated. CONCLUSIONS: Complete vaccination with 4CMenB was found to be effective in preventing invasive disease by serogroup B and non-serogroup B meningococci in children younger than 5 years of age.

The impact of vaccine procurement methods on public health in selected European countries.

Introduction: Across Europe, immunization programs have brought immense benefits to the prevention of infectious diseases. The vaccines used are procured through a variety of models such as tenders and Pricing & Reimbursement. However, to date, the impact of the procurement method on the performance and sustainability of vaccination programs and on public health has received little attention.Areas covered: Drawing on a review of the academic and policy literature, complemented by an interview program with stakeholders involved in the procurement of vaccines, the authors have documented the relationship between procurement method dynamics and the level of protection against vaccine-preventable diseases in Germany, Italy, Spain and Romania for, measles-containing vaccines, hexavalent and influenza vaccines.Expert opinion: Price-based tenders can contribute to vaccine supply issues, discourage the provision of value-added services supporting vaccination coverage and disincentives future R&D. Although it is observed that price-based tenders can intensify competition in the short term, there can be unintended consequences such as damage to long-term competition. As European countries are committed to strengthen their immunization programs, they should consider the implications of current vaccine procurement models on the vaccine ecosystem and on public health.

Vaccines for the prevention of infections in adults: an opinion paper on the situation in Spain / Vacunas para la prevención de infecciones en adultos: artículo de opinión sobre la situación en España

The childhood immunization schedule is well known and generally well implemented in developed countries. For various reasons, the same is not true of vaccines aimed at preventing infections in adults, in which vaccination coverage is incomplete and generally very deficient. In order to assess the situation of adult vaccination in Spain, the Fundación de Ciencias de la Salud has brought together a series of experts in different fields, including doctors, nurses, representatives of patient associations, health managers and economists, health authorities and journalists to deal with this issue. The format was that of a round table in which a series of questions previously formulated by the coordinators were to be answered and debated. The document presented is not an exhaustive review of the topic, nor is it intended to make recommendations, but only to give a multidisciplinary opinion on topics that could be particularly debatable or controversial. The paper reviews the main vaccine-preventable adult diseases, their clinical and economic impact, the possibilities of reducing them with vaccination programmes and the difficulties in carrying them out. The role of nursing, pharmacy services, patient associations and the health administration itself in changing the current situation was discussed. Prospects for new vaccines were discussed and we speculated on the future in this field. Finally, particularly relevant ethical aspects in decision-making regarding vaccination were discussed, which must be faced by both individuals and states. We have tried to summarize, at the end of the presentation of each question, the environment of opinion that was agreed with all the members of the table

El calendario de vacunación infantil es bien conocido y generalmente bien implementado en los países desarrollados. Por varias razones, no ocurre lo mismo en el caso de las vacunas destinadas a prevenir las infecciones en adultos, en los que la cobertura vacunal es incompleta y generalmente muy deficiente. Con el fin de evaluar la situación de la vacunación de adultos en España, la Fundación de Ciencias de la Salud ha reunido a una serie de expertos en diferentes campos, incluyendo médicos, enfermeras, representantes de asociaciones de pacientes, gestores sanitarios, economistas, autoridades sanitarias y periodistas para discutir este asunto. El formato fue el de una mesa redonda en la que una serie de preguntas, formuladas previamente por los coordinadores, debían ser contestadas y debatidas. El documento presentado no es una revisión exhaustiva del tema, ni tiene por objeto hacer recomendaciones, simplemente pretende dar una opinión multidisciplinar sobre aspectos que pueden ser debatibles o controvertidos. El documento revisa las principales enfermedades de los adultos que pueden prevenirse con vacunas, su impacto clínico y económico, las posibilidades de reducirlos con los programas de vacunación y las dificultades para llevarlos a cabo. Se discutió el papel de la enfermería, la farmacia, los servicios de salud, las asociaciones de pacientes y la propia administración sanitaria para cambiar la situación actual. Se evaluaron las perspectivas para nuevas vacunas y se especuló sobre el futuro en este campo. Por último, se discutieron los aspectos éticos especialmente relevantes en la toma de decisiones con respecto a la vacunación, que deben ser afrontados tanto por los individuos como por los estados. Hemos intentado resumir, al final de la presentación de cada pregunta, la opinión que representaba el consenso de todos los miembros de la mesa

Hospitalizations realted to herpes zoster infection in the Canary Islands, Spain (2005-2014).

BACKGROUND: Herpes zoster is an important problem of public health especially among the elderly in Spain. METHODS: A population-based retrospective epidemiological study to estimate the burden of herpes zoster requiring hospitalization in the Canary Islands, Spain was conducted by using data from the national surveillance system for hospital data, Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos. Records of all patients admitted to hospital with a diagnosis of herpes zoster in any position and cases of primary diagnosis (ICD-9-MC codes 053.0-053.9) during a 10-year period (2005-2014), were selected. RESULTS: A total of 1088 hospitalizations with a primary or secondary diagnosis of herpes zoster were identified during the study period. Annually there were 6.99 hospitalizations by herpes zoster per 100,000 population. It increases with age reaching a maximum in persons ≥85 years of age (43.98 admissions per 100,000). Average length of hospitalization was 16 days and 73 patients died, with a case-fatality rate of 4.03%. In 22% of the cases hospitalized, herpes zoster was the primary diagnosis. CONCLUSION: The hospitalization burden of herpes zoster in adults in the Canary Islands was still important during the last decade and justify the implementation of preventive measures, like vaccination in the elderly or other high risk groups to reduce the most severe cases of the disease.

Consenso sobre la vacunación anti-neumocócica en el adulto por riesgo de edad y patología de base. Actualización 2017 / Consensus document on pneumococcal vaccination in adults at risk by age and underlying clinical conditions. 2017 Update

La enfermedad neumocócica invasiva (ENI) y la neumonía neumocócica (NN) suponen un grave problema de salud entre los adultos de mayor edad y aquellos con determinadas condiciones y patologías de base, entre los que destacan los inmunodeprimidos y algunos inmunocompetentes, que les hacen más susceptibles a la infección y favorecen cuadros de mayor gravedad y peor evolución. Entre las estrategias para prevenir la ENI y la NN se encuentra la vacunación, aunque las coberturas vacunales son más bajas de lo deseable. Actualmente, existen 2 vacunas disponibles para el adulto. La vacuna polisacárida (VNP23), que se emplea en mayores de 2 años de edad desde hace décadas, es la que mayor número de serotipos (23) incluye, pero no genera memoria inmunitaria, los niveles de anticuerpos disminuyen con el tiempo, provoca un fenómeno de tolerancia inmunitaria y no actúa sobre la colonización nasofaríngea. La vacuna conjugada (VNC13) puede emplearse a cualquier edad de la vida a partir de las 6 semanas de vida y genera una respuesta inmunitaria más potente que la VNP23 frente a la mayoría de los 13 serotipos en ella incluidos. En el año 2013 las 16 Sociedades Científicas más directamente relacionadas con los grupos de riesgo para padecer ENI publicamos un documento de Consenso con una serie de recomendaciones basadas en las evidencias científicas respecto a la vacunación antineumocócica en el adulto con condiciones especiales y patología de base. Se estableció un compromiso de discusión y actualización ante la aparición de nuevas evidencias. Fruto de este trabajo de revisión, presentamos una actualización del anterior documento junto a otras nuevas Sociedades Científicas donde destaca la recomendación por edad (AU)

Invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) and pneumococcal pneumonia (PP) represent an important health problem among aging adults and those with certain underlying pathologies and some diseases, especially immunosuppressed and some immunocompetent subjects, who are more susceptible to infections and present greater severity and worse evolution. Among the strategies to prevent IPD and PP, vaccination has its place, although vaccination coverage in this group is lower than desirable. Nowadays, there are 2 vaccines available for adults. Polysacharide vaccine (PPV23), used in patients aged 2 and older since decades ago, includes a greater number of serotypes (23), but it does not generate immune memory, antibody levels decrease with time, causes an immune tolerance phenomenon, and have no effect on nasopharyngeal colonization. PCV13 can be used from children 6 weeks of age to elderly and generates an immune response more powerful than PPV23 against most of the 13 serotypes included in it. In the year 2013 the 16 most directly related to groups of risk of presenting IPD publised a series of vaccine recommendations based on scientific evidence regarding antipneumococcal vaccination in adults with underlying pathologies and special conditions. A commitment was made about updating it if new scientific evidence became available. We present an exhaustive revised document focusing mainly in recommendation by age in which some more Scientific Societies have been involved (AU)

Recomendaciones de vacunación frente a neumococo en enfermos renales en España / Recommendations for vaccination against pneumococcus in kidney patients in Spain

La enfermedad neumocócica invasiva (ENI) supone un grave problema en algunos grupos de riesgo: los pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica estadios 4 y 5 y aquellos con estadio 3 y tratamiento inmunosupresor, síndrome nefrótico o diabetes. Estos individuos son más susceptibles de adquirir la infección y más propensos a padecer cuadros de mayor gravedad y peor evolución. Entre las estrategias para prevenir la ENI se encuentra la vacunación, aunque las coberturas vacunales en este grupo son más bajas de lo deseable hoy en día. Actualmente, disponemos de dos vacunas para el adulto. La vacuna polisacárida (VNP23), que se emplea en mayores de 2 años de edad desde hace décadas, es la que mayor número de serotipos (23) incluye, pero no genera memoria inmunitaria, provoca un fenómeno de tolerancia inmunitaria y no actúa sobre la colonización nasofaríngea. La vacuna conjugada (VNC13) puede emplearse desde lactantes hasta la edad adulta (la indicación en mayores de 18 años ha recibido la aprobación de la Agencia Europea de Medicamentos en julio de 2013) y genera una respuesta inmunitaria más potente que la VNP23 frente a la mayoría de los 13 serotipos en ella incluidos. Las 16 sociedades científicas más directamente relacionadas con los grupos de riesgo para padecer ENI han trabajado en la discusión y elaboración de una serie de recomendaciones vacunales basadas en las evidencias científicas respecto a la vacunación antineumocócica en el adulto con condiciones y patología de base que se recogen en el documento «Consenso: Vacunación antineumocócica en el adulto con patología de base». En el presente texto se recogen las recomendaciones de vacunación para la población de enfermos renales crónicos (AU)

Invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) is a serious problem in some risk groups: patients with stage 4 and 5 chronic kidney disease, stage 3 CKD undergoing immunosuppressive treatment, nephrotic syndrome or diabetes. These individuals are more susceptible to infections and more prone to suffering more severe and worsening symptoms. Vaccination is one of the strategies for preventing IPD, although vaccination coverage in this group at present is lower than desired. Currently, there are two vaccinations for adults. The polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23), used for decades in patients over the age of 2, includes most serotypes (23), but it does not generate immune memory, causing the immune tolerance phenomenon and it does not act on nasopharyngeal colonisation. The conjugate vaccine (VNC13) can be used from infancy until adulthood (advice in patients over 18 years old received approval from the European Medicines Agency in July 2013) and generates a more powerful immune response than PPSV23 against the majority of the 13 serotypes that it includes. The 16 scientific societies most directly associated with the groups at risk of IPD have discussed and drafted a series of vaccination recommendations based on scientific evidence related to pneumococcal vaccination in adults with underlying conditions and pathologies, which are the subject of the document "Consensus: Pneumococcal vaccination in adults with underlying pathology". This text sets out the vaccination recommendations for the chronic kidney disease population (AU)

Recommendations for vaccination against pneumococcus in kidney patients in Spain.

UNLABELLED: Invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) is a serious problem in some risk groups: patients with stage 4 and 5 chronic kidney disease, stage 3 CKD undergoing immunosuppressive treatment, nephrotic syndrome or diabetes. These individuals are more susceptible to infections and more prone to suffering more severe and worsening symptoms. Vaccination is one of the strategies for preventing IPD, although vaccination coverage in this group at present is lower than desired. Currently, there are two vaccinations for adults. The polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23), used for decades in patients over the age of 2, includes most serotypes (23), but it does not generate immune memory, causing the immune tolerance phenomenon and it does not act on nasopharyngeal colonisation. The conjugate vaccine (VNC13) can be used from infancy until adulthood (advice in patients over 18 years old received approval from the European Medicines Agency in July 2013) and generates a more powerful immune response than PPSV23 against the majority of the 13 serotypes that it includes. The 16 scientific societies most directly associated with the groups at risk of IPD have discussed and drafted a series of vaccination recommendations based on scientific evidence related to pneumococcal vaccination in adults with underlying conditions and pathologies, which are the subject of the document “ CONSENSUS: Pneumococcal vaccination in adults with underlying pathology”. This text sets out the vaccination recommendations for the chronic kidney disease population.

Consenso sobre la vacunación anti-neumocócica en el adulto con patología de base / No disponible

La enfermedad neumocócica invasiva (ENI) supone un grave problema de salud entre los adultos con determinadas condiciones y patologías de base, entre los que destacan los inmunodeprimidos y algunos inmunocompetentes, que les hacen más susceptibles a la infección y favorecen cuadros de mayor gravedad y peor evolución. Entre las estrategias para prevenir la ENI se encuentra la vacunación, aunque las coberturas vacunales en este grupo son más bajas de lo deseable. Actualmente, existen 2 vacunas disponibles para el adulto. La vacuna polisacárida (VNP23), que se emplea en mayores de 2 años de edad desde hace décadas, es la que mayor número de serotipos (23) incluye, pero no genera memoria inmunitaria, los niveles de anticuerpos disminuyen con el tiempo, provoca un fenómeno de tolerancia inmunitaria y no actúa sobre la colonización nasofaríngea. La vacuna conjugada (VNC13) puede emplearse desde lactantes hasta la edad adulta (la indicación en mayores de 18 años ha recibido la aprobación de la Agencia Europea del Medicamento en julio de 2013) y genera una respuesta inmunitaria más potente que la VNP23 frente a la mayoría de los 13 serotipos en ella incluidos. Las 16 Sociedades Científicas más directamente relacionadas con los grupos de riesgo para padecer ENI han trabajado en la discusión y elaboración de una serie de recomendaciones vacunales basadas en las evidencias científicas respecto a la vacunación anti-neumocócica en el adulto con condiciones y patología de base que se detallan en este documento. Se trata de un documento “vivo” que seguirá actualizándose ante nuevas evidencias científicas disponibles (AU)

Epidemiology of diabetes-related lower extremity amputations in Gran Canaria, Canary Islands (Spain).

We have studied the rate of lower extremity amputations (LEAs) in the south of Gran Canaria. The incidence rate was 319.7 per 100,000 (95% CI, 258.6-380.8) per year in the diabetic subjects. The incidence of both diabetic and non-diabetic LEAs is the highest reported in Spain.

Documento de consenso de las sociedades científicas españolas. Vacunas profilácticas frente al VPH / No disponible

No disponible